This is part three of a multipart collection of articles concerning proposed anti-gambling legislation. In this article, I retain the dialogue of the reasons claimed to make this regulation essential, and the records that exist inside the real world, including the Jack Abramoff connection and the addictive nature of on line gambling.
The legislators are seeking to shield us from 메이저사이트 some thing, or are they? The complete thing seems a bit puzzling to say the least.
As cited in previous articles, the House, and the Senate, are yet again considering the problem of “Online Gambling”. Bills have been submitted by way of Congressmen Goodlatte and Leach, and additionally with the aid of Senator Kyl.
The bill being recommend with the aid of Rep. Goodlatte, The Internet Gambling Prohibition Act, has the stated purpose of updating the Wire Act to outlaw all sorts of on-line playing, to make it illegal for a gambling enterprise to just accept credit and digital transfers, and to force ISPs and Common Carriers to dam access to gambling associated web sites on the request of law enforcement.
Just as does Rep. Goodlatte, Sen. Kyl, in his bill, Prohibition on Funding of Unlawful Internet Gambling, makes it illegal for gambling organizations to just accept credit cards, electronic transfers, exams and other styles of fee for the purpose on placing unlawful bets, but his invoice does no longer address people who place bets.
The invoice submitted by way of Rep. Leach, The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, is basically a replica of the invoice submitted via Sen. Kyl. It makes a speciality of stopping playing agencies from accepting credit playing cards, electronic transfers, checks, and different payments, and like the Kyl invoice makes no changes to what is presently legal, or unlawful.
In a quote from Goodlatte we’ve “Jack Abramoff’s total brush aside for the legislative system has allowed Internet gambling to keep thriving into what’s now a twelve billion-greenback https://ggongmoney2030.com/ enterprise which now not most effective hurts individuals and their families however makes the economic system suffer with the aid of draining billions of dollars from the United States and serves as a vehicle for money laundering.”
There are several exciting factors right here.
First of all, we’ve a little misdirection approximately Jack Abramoff and his dismiss for the legislative system. This comment, and others which have been made, follow the good judgment that; 1) Jack Abramoff turned into against those bills, 2) Jack Abramoff become corrupt, 3) to avoid being associated with corruption you should vote for these bills. This is of direction absurd. If we followed this good judgment to the extreme, we ought to cross back and void any payments that Abramoff supported, and enact any bills that he hostile, regardless of the content of the invoice. Legislation ought to be exceeded, or no longer, based at the merits of the proposed rules, no longer based at the reputation of 1 individual.